2026 NFL నియమ మార్పులు: టష్ పుష్ టు స్టే; 5 ప్రతిపాదనలపై ఓటు వేయాలి

The tush push will live on for at least another season. 

Following another year of debate over the legality of the tush push, a proposal on whether to ban the play will not be voted on at the NFL’s league meetings in Arizona next week. However, the competition committee will push forward five other proposed rule changes for the 2026 NFL season next Tuesday. 

“There is less talk about it in the football community,” said Rich McKay, the chair of the competition committee.

A proposal to ban the tush push was voted on last May, with the NFL owners voting 22-10 in favor of banning the play. But all proposed rule changes need at least 24 votes in order to be approved. 

The tush push faced scrutiny during the Philadelphia Eagles’ run to a Super Bowl title in 2024, with the play being one of the most successful plays in the NFL that season. Philadelphia continued to use the tush push in 2025, and there was speculation that the play would be removed from the game this offseason. In the Eagles’ Week 2 win over the Kansas City Chiefs this past year, there were multiple instances where it appeared players on Philadelphia’s offensive line were offside. FOX Sports NFL rules analyst Dean Blandino questioned the legality of the play during that game, but later said he thought it was “50-50” that the play would get banned. 

As for the other proposed rule changes, the NFL is preparing for the possibility of replacement officials in the 2026 season, proposing a rule change for one season that would allow the replay center in New York to correct any “clear and obvious” mistakes by on-field officials in case of a work stoppage. There are also a few proposed changes that would slightly tweak the kick-off rule and allow the replay center to eject players for flagrant acts on plays that were not penalized on the field.

Here’s more about a few of the proposed rule changes being put forth by the competition committee at next week’s league meetings. 

Replacement ref contingencies 

The biggest proposal regards the contingency if there is a work stoppage with the officials and the league once again uses replacement officials as it did to start the 2012 season. The current collective bargaining agreement with the NFL and the NFL Referees Association expires on May 31.

The NFL used replacement officials for the first three weeks of the 2012 season with several mistakes and bad calls being made. The tipping point came at the end of a Monday night game in Week 3 between Green Bay and Seattle when the Seahawks won the game on a disputed TD catch known as the “Fail Mary.” The league later said the touchdown should have been negated for offensive pass interference.

The outrage reached the White House with President Barack Obama calling for the lockout to end, which it did a few days later, prompting an apology to fans from Commissioner Roger Goodell.

Under the proposal from the competition committee, the replay center in New York would be able to advise the on-field officials on any missed roughing the passer or intentional grounding penalty, as well as any act that would have led to an ejection had a penalty been called.

The replay center can also intervene to overturn calls that were made on several penalties, including illegal contact, face masks, roughing the passer, horse-collar tackles and intentional grounding. The replay center could also assist to overturn pass interference calls when there is clear evidence that there was “advertent tangling of feet when both players were playing the ball or neither player was playing the ball.”

In the final two minutes of either half or for all of overtime, the replay center would be allowed to overturn or throw a flag on any unnecessary roughness or unsportsmanlike conduct for throwing a punch, forearm or kick; as well as leaping or leverage penalties on kicks.

The replay center can also correct wrong calls based on running into or roughing the kicker.

The committee also proposed allowing the officiating center in New York to eject players for committing a flagrant or non-football act on the field, even if it wasn’t called for a penalty. Under the old rules, the replay center could only intervene in those cases when the on-field officials had called a penalty.

This proposal comes after Pittsburgh receiver DK Metcalf wasn’t ejected from a game at Detroit last season when he got into an altercation with a heckling fan. Because the on-field officials didn’t see the play when Metcalf swiped at the fan and throw a flag, the replay center was unable to eject Metcalf. The league did suspend him for two games, but he was able to remain in the game at the time.

Kickoff changes

The committee also proposed several minor tweaks to the new kickoff rule that is entering its third season, including allowing teams to declare an onside kick at any point in the game. The original rule in 2024 limited onside kicks to the fourth quarter when a team is trailing. The change last year allowed a trailing team to declare an onside kick at any point and now a team can declare an onside kick no matter the score.

The committee also proposed a small change to how the receiving team lines up to receive kickoffs and made changes to the touchback on kicks that start from the 50 instead of the 35 following a personal foul penalty.

Under the rule last year, the kicking team was incentivized to kick out of bounds from the 50 to give the receiving team the ball on the 25 instead of the 35 for a touchback. Under the new proposal, touchbacks on kicks from the 50 will be spotted at the 20.

Off-field changes

There were also a few proposals to change bylaws for off-field rules.

The committee also proposed giving the league the latitude to alter the date of the roster cutdown day, which is currently the Tuesday following the final exhibition games, to accommodate an international game in Week 1. The Los Angeles Rams and San Francisco 49ers are set to open the regular season in Australia and this gives the league the option to alter those dates based on when the teams travel to Australia.

The committee also proposed making the Saturday and Sunday of Labor Day weekend as business days, allowing for the 24-hour waiver period for players to go into effect on those days instead of waiting until Monday.

The committee also proposed allowing players who began training camp on the physically unable to perform list and were kept on the PUP list after roster cutdown day to be allowed to open their 21-day practice window after Week 2 of the regular season. The players still can’t be put on the active roster until after missing four games but they now are able to practice sooner.

The owners also could vote on two proposals made last week by teams, including one by Cleveland to allow draft picks to be traded five years into the future instead of three and one by Pittsburgh to allow teams to have up to five video or phone calls with potential free agents during the negotiating window before the start of the league year. That was allowed on a trial basis this year and the Steelers are proposing that the rule to be permanent.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.